The Send Out Cards MLM – Scam? Ripoff? Get the Facts.

Send Out Cards MLM Scam Ripoff

I think Send Out Cards is a scam and that Send Out Cards sucks. The facts seem to agree with my opinion, but you can decide for yourself. Here’s what you need to know about Send Out Cards, and the MLM world in general.

For a few years I was an independent distributor with a Network Marketing Company (also called a Multi-Level Marketing Company, or MLM for short) called Send Out Cards (SOC for short). Like most people I met who got involved with that MLM businesses I really didn’t understand as much about what I was getting suckered into as I thought I did. As I tried to work the business, and learned more about how it really functions, I came to an important realization: MLM businesses suck, and Send Out Cards is very useful as an example of why.

Note that this article was originally published on one of my other blogs, one I am closing down, but the information is valuable so this is being preserved. I moved it here and updated the graphics. Click the button to read more.

I went to training sessions. I spoke with my upline. I met a lot of well-intentioned people offering advice. I listened to the motivational speeches of the top earners. In the end, though, the reality of it began to sink in: the business model sucked, the company sucked, the higher-ups sucked, and the entire function of the business is, for all practical purposes, to suck the money out of bright-eyed, hopeful masses of people and channel it into the pockets of the top dogs. I tried to help myself and others by teaching practical sales skills and the like, and I spoke out against some of the worst practices on the company web forums. They banned me from the forums for that, and eventually kicked me out of the company, did not refund my fees, and kept money I had on account without returning it.

This is no shock to those of you who hate MLM companies already, and think of them as pyramid scams. When you read this article all you will find is validation (with math to back it up) of your existing opinion. If you feel like sending an “attaboy” that’s great, but you’re not my real target audience. I am really writing this for the poor masses of people still being suckered by MLM businesses. I’m going to show how MLMs suck the money out of you, show how to see it clearly in any MLM company, and hope that will save a few people from losing their shirts to this awful, evil industry.

The crux of seeing just how bad an MLM is resides in a document they are required by law to make available. It’s called an income disclosure statement. As I write I have another window open looking at the most recent one available for SendOutCards. It’s their 2012 calendar year document, and can be found at this link as of march 24, 2013.

It’s a PDF. Here’s what it looks like:

SOC Income Disclosure 2012 Full Size

SOC Income Disclosure 2012 – click for Full Size

Income disclosure statements are required to present the actual income figures for the MLM business in question. That does not mean they cannot be assembled and worded in ways that make the company look good when it’s not, or at least look good to the untrained eye. Sadly, most consumers are not mathematicians, and do not really understand the significance of what they see in that document. That’s why I am going to pick it apart for you.

For starters, keep in mind that it opens with a disclaimer. All that language in black above the red bar basically says: Swim in these shark-infested waters at your own risk, sucker. And they’re not kidding. If you don’t make money at this (and you won’t, rest assured of that) they will blame you for it even though the real fault is with the business model itself. People will tell distributors to work harder, do more, put in more time – anything and everything except to see that the system is not designed for them to succeed. I’ll get back to that point later.

The Numbers
The first thing you will notice about this is that it has a lot of numbers, breaks distributors down into classes like “active” and “inactive” and uses mathematical terms most folks haven’t really evaluated since middle school like “average” and “median”. In fact, the one term (average) that most people will relate to isn’t what most people think. Let’s start by taking a look at what an average actually is.

An average, in this case, is the number you get when you total a set of values and divide that total by the number of entries. It sounds more complicated than you remember, right? And that’s for a good reason: because it is. Averages can be misleading when they contain extremely low values, extremely high values, or both. Let’s simply this with an example.

Think back to your school days. If you have a sheet cake shared by 4 people, and they averaged 25% of the cake each, how much does each person get? This is what most people will assume the portions look like:

What most people think an average of 25% looks like

What most people think an average of 25% looks like

The problem with that assumption is that it is far, far from the only way to arrive at that average. Here’s another way, showing what happens when one person gets greedy and wants all the cake:

This is also a 25 percent average

This is also a 25 percent average

It’s even worse when applied to larger numbers of people. Imagine we’re talking about people earning money. If you have 100 people, who earned an average of $100, it could mean each person earned that $100. It could also mean that 99 of them earned nothing, and one earned $10,000. The average turns out exactly the same. This, in fact, is close to how things work at SendOutCards, and every other MLM I have investigated.

Now, let’s go back to the income disclosure sheet to prove it. Take a look at the text below the chart. The second line says this:

Sixty Two percent (62%) of U.S. Distributors did not earn any commissions in 2012.

Think about that. That means of everybody in the United States who ever signed up, more than half of them earned nothing last year. Zero. Zip. Goose Egg. All those figures in the chart talking about people who made money? That’s just the remaining 38% Think about that earlier example with the four boxes. Imagine that instead of 4 boxes you have 100 of them. That one statement from the Income Disclosure Sheet means the first 62 of those boxes are filled with zeroes just like this:

What 62 percent making nothing looks like

What 62 percent making nothing looks like

That’s what “62% of the distributors made nothing” looks like.

But wait, it gets worse
That’s not the entire story of how bad the situation is, however. To understand the real horror of it you have to keep something else in mind: Distributors are paying, out of their own pocket, just to participate. It’s what we call a “pay to play” model. When I was still a distributor the act of enrolling as a distributor cost about $470, and distributors were “strongly encouraged” to go on the auto-order system for $31 per month, or $372 per year. That would allow them to receive commissions and cover the cost of sending 50 cards per month (which, of, course, distributors were also “strongly encouraged” to do. That did not include postage, however, which would cost another $276 per year at today’s prices.

In other words, the most basic of distributors would typically pay, in the first year:

  • About $470 to sign up
  • Another $372 to buy cards
  • Another $276 in stamps
  • Total of about $1,118 in the first year

Keep in mind as you look at that total that, according to the Income Disclosure Sheet 62% of people paying that will never earn a cent. It’s a straight loss of over a grand to just shy of 2/3 of all distributors. And guess what? It gets even worse.

Worse how?
SendOutCards also allows people to send gifts with cards, and “encourages” distributors to do so frequently in order to “demonstrate the product”. The most-suggested item when I was with the company was a box of brownies. They cost almost $10 per box, and increased the postage cost as well. That $1,118 isn’t even close to what someone will lose in year one if they follow SOC’s suggested plan for using the product yourself to promote it to others. Add to it the cost of training materials, pamphlets and the like and that overall loss would typically double to over $2,000 in the first year. Add to that the cost of phone calls, driving to meet people, gasoline, etc. and it runs up even more.

My understanding is that now SOC has added fees necessary to advance in rank as well. When they rolled out new product features, like their Picture Plus 2.0 item, Distributors had to buy it for themselves if they wanted to use it (and understand it enough to sell it). It really is kind of a nightmare. And there’s more.

Wait, that’s not all?
No, of course not. Take another look at the income disclosure sheet. The first two ranks of distributors make up 93%-94% of the entire distributor base (both of the first two columns total in that range, so we can look at them as one group.) The entry level group (Distributors, top row)  averages only about $18 a year. They are still in effectively the same boat as the people who made nothing, losing a grand total of about $1,100 the year they sign up. The second group (Senior Distributors, 2nd row) does a little bit better – but it’s still a massive suck-fest. Senior distributors only average about $36 per year. They’re still out almost as much as the entry level folks.

Adding the third tier (Manager, 3rd row) the average is still not enough to recover half the first year basic expenses.

What’s that bit about a “median?” Is that the same as an average?
Good question. No, it’s not. A median is the value that half the sample is higher than, and half is lower than. In other words, going back to that first row, the median of $7.44 means that half the people in that row made LESS THAN $7.44 in a year. That means it’s not a matter of half the people making less than the average and half making more. It means so many people are making so little that half of them don’t even make 41% of the average.

Here’s another set of four items:

Average 25 percent, median of 12 percent

Average 25 percent, median of 12 percent

In this case the top guy gets 3 times as much cake as the next-highest earner, and 75 times as much as the two guys stuck at the bottom of the ladder. Those four values still have an average of 25, but a median of just 12.

If you notice, that trend continues through all the ranks – the median is always a lot lower than the average (with one exception). That means there are a small number of people who make way, way more than the average, dragging that number way higher than the median.

In fact, if you take a look at the top 4 categories (and let me tell you, it is not easy to reach that 4th one, you have to recruit a TON of people to get there) they account for 98.2% of all the distributors around. I know a guy who reached that rank and had a downline of over 550 people and still could not break the barrier to the next level. Even at that rank the median is almost identical to the first year minimum expenses. That means of the bottom 98.2%, half of the top-rank in that group STILL barely make enough to break even with the first year’s expenses – and it takes them mainly longer to reach that rank than a year, so the expenses all pile up even further.

In the end, this horror show is what it actually looks like. These numbers are what SOC distributors make per year, in thousands of dollars (remember, they are SPENDING over a grand a year just to follow SOC’s “recommended method”:

Send Out Cards Approximate Actual Income Chart

Send Out Cards Approximate Actual Income Chart

So, after expenses: You have about 96% of them who, including expenses, make nothing or take a loss. You have about 2% who make about $1,000 a year. After that comes a tiny sliver that makes about $21,000 per year. About 2% above that make about $87,000 per year. All the way at the top are the Eagles, which are LESS THAN 1/100th of 1% of all distributors, making about $538,000 per year.

The really, really evil bit about this
All that money the bottom level people are throwing down the SOC hole isn’t just disappearing. It’s creating commissions checks for everyone above them in the chain – the person who recruited them, the person who recruited that guy, and on and on up the chain. That means all that money being lost by one rank’s expenses is actually considered the profit of the higher ranks.

Those people in the 5th tier who appear to finally make some real money at this? All that money being lost by the 4 ranks beneath them is filtering up into their hands. That’s how it works, and not just at SOC. That’s the entire premise of the MLM business model.

See, the rich folks at the very top don’t have to sell anything at all. Their whole job is to keep other people in the system so their network remains large. If you’re an Eagle (top rank, last row) with over 40,000 people in your downline (the suffering members of the lower ranks) you make most of your money this way:

The Eagle gets a percentage of every dollar that low ranking person beneath him brings in, sometimes as much as 25%-30%. Let’s assume that guy (and there is one just like that named Jordan Adler) get’s just $1 a month from money flowing upwards through his network of over 40,000 people. That would be making $480,000 per year just for sitting back and giving some motivational speeches to keep the attrition rate down.

Here’s where things get disgusting
The sick part is that MLM companies like SOC teach that as a GOOD THING. They call it things like “your passive income stream” because it’s money that rolls in even if you are kicking back on a beach – the very point, in fact, of Jordan Adler’s book Beach Money (which, of course, you can pay to read, but since I already did I will share with you that in my opinion it’s nothing but fluff). What’s not mentioned is that all that beach money comes in large part from the suffering and financial loss of people sucked into this rotten, vile system with stars in their eyes.

Think about it. Adler had, when I was with the company, over 40,000 people down his chain. If 62% of them made nothing, that is 24,800 people who each paid over a thousand dollars with no effect other than funneling money upward towards Adler. At $1,118 each that’s $27,726,400 spent by people who never recovered even a single cent of it.

And it’s not like people at that level don’t know how damaging this is. They have entire prepared speeches telling you that this is not a scam, not a pyramid, that anyone can succeed if they work the system, etc. They know the problem is there and are very well versed in how to deflect any concerns people voice.

And, of course, they proved in my case that when someone cannot be hoodwinked with distractions, distortion, and incorrect information, well, they can just kick him out to silence him.

A note about THE BIG LIE of Network Marketing
Remember that Jordan Adler made his riches by recruiting. He did not make it by selling cards. His entire success story is the result of him recruiting a bunch of people, and teaching them to be recruiters as well. The big lie of network marketing is when anyone in it tells you that it’s not about recruitment. It is absolutely about recruitment. Anyone telling you differently is wrong, and is either misinformed or flat-out lying to you. The ONLY way to make big money in network marketing is to follow these steps:

  1. Recruit as many people as possible no matter how harmful that may be
  2. Teach your recruits to do exactly the same thing, passing down that lesson level after level

The high earners will tell you that you do not have to be a salesman to succeed. They are wrong. You have to be able to thrive as one of the most hated kinds of salesmen in the world, selling membership rather than product, and have a shark-like ability to close in for the sales kill without remorse or concern – all while convincing everyone that you have their best interests at heart even while you can watch them go bankrupt.

The numbers get even worse, though
As if that were not bad enough, keep in mind that the first “successful” tier (Executive, 5th row) has an average income of just $22,076.27 per year, gross. If you can find a $10/hour job you can make more than that, without having to buy your way in and stack up endless expenses. Even at that rank (and there are darn few people who ever make it that far) the median is still just $10,597.25 That means half the people at that rank are making about 1/2 to 2/3 of what a full-time, minimum-wage job would earn them.

If you look at the left-hand column you can see that the portion of all distributors who reach the top two ranks, where a real, family-sustaining living can be had, account for less than .03 percent. That’s fewer than 3 out of every 10,000 people who get involved in SOC who actually make it into something really profitable – but that profit comes at the cost of the massive financial loss and suffering of others.

A side-effect worse than bad medication
The final kick in the head about this is that for most people, joining SOC (or any other MLM) carries an additional side effect: You lose friends. Lots of friends. Even all of your friends. Why? Because you’ll start seeing them as prospects, not friends, and everyone hates that. You’ll be “encouraged” to contact your friends and family, and try to recruit them, sell to them, and get them to host “parties” where you try to recruit their friends and sell to their friends.

It makes you a social outcast. You know that one person in your circle who sells Amway, and they never shut the hell up about it? That will become you if you join an MLM. People don’t start out consumed by their MLM. It’s a learned behavior, and one taught by cult-like indoctrination. You’ll get tons of new “friends” from the MLM, though – other victims sucked in by the system, all sharing the same struggle, swapping bad ideas, making “dream boards” and trying to “work the system.”

They’re not really your friends, though. They are your competition, because they are also commissioned sales reps for the same product you sell. You all have a direct, financial conflict of interest with each other. You end up trading your real relationships for these cult-like, zombie-brained connections with people you are trying to beat to the sale.

Take my word for it – you can do permanent harm to your friendships and family relationships, and not all of it can ever be repaired. I’ve been there and I know from personal experience just how high that cost can be.

The Last Word
I have researched a lot of MLMs. Every single one works the way I described in this article. MLM companies are not your big break. They are not your opportunity to make it rich. They are more like buying a lottery ticket that costs thousands of dollars, has a crappy payout even if you win, and that makes all your friends and family hate you. If you’re making a lot of money in an MLM you are hurting people to make it. The moral and ethical thing for you to do is leave. If you are losing money in an MLM you are making someone else rich while you suffer. The smart thing is for you to cut your losses.

If you get involved and lose money, which you will in about 99% of cases, your self-esteem will be undermined. You’ll be told it’s your fault. A system designed to rob you blind will never be blamed. You’ll work hard and accomplish nothing and be told you are the reason for your failure. It’s horrible to experience.

If you want to see what being in an MLM is really like, watch the movie Believe. It’s a spoof of the MLM world that is painful to watch because it is so accurate. The format is “mockumentary” but it is so spot-on that when my family watched it after I left the MLM world it took only the first 12 minutes to have us in tears of sadness at just how bad the real-life experience had been because the movie just nailed it. It’s available on Netflix, on DVD or streaming, as of this writing.

Do yourself a favor – stay as far away from MLMs as you can. MLM businesses suck. Remember that the system is not designed to help everyone in it succeed. If you do not make money in the MLM world it does not make you a failure. It does not mean you did not work hard enough. It does not mean you didn’t sell enough product, host enough parties, talk to enough people, or make enough phone calls. It means everything proceeded according to plan and you were a victim of a system designed to make other people rich.

Give yourself credit for the effort you put in. Give yourself respect for having given a solid effort. It is not your fault that the system is rigged against you. Reach out to your friends and family. Let them know you realize that the MLM world was a bad idea. Tell them you miss them and invite them back into your life. Your real friends and family will help you rebuild those relationships.

Expect that when you leave your former MLM colleagues will treat you poorly. They will try to bring you back into the fold, as all cults do. When that fails they will ostracize you. Resist the urge to give in to their calls to return to the MLM world. Like any cult members they are still drinking the Kool-Aid and want you back because it validates their choice to be in an MLM.

Protect yourself and your finances from this horrible trap. It’s OK to cut your losses and find a better path. I promise you that success in the MLM world is not “just around the corner”. You are a wonderful person, a one-in-a-million person, but the system does not reward that. It rewards cold-hearted, callous people more concerned about profit than they are about the harm they cause others; people who can smile to your face while planting a financial knife in your back. If you’re a good person you won’t act that way, so the system won’t work for you.

Be glad it doesn’t work, in fact. If it did, well, that would say very bad things about your character.

I hope the explanations in this article have been helpful and informative. I hope it will reach a great many people in the MLM world who are losing money hand over fist. I hope it will help some make the decision to save themselves from that despicable industry; even one person saved would be a wonderful achievement.

If you have a story about your escape from the MLM world it would be great to hear it. Please feel free to share it with us in the comments, or reach out to me by e-mail or my contact form.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

13 Responses to “The Send Out Cards MLM – Scam? Ripoff? Get the Facts.”

  1. Cam says:

    I think you review is too narrow and biased against MLM.

    I would like to see how you would review the banks or even insurance companies.

    I think sendout cards cards system is a very nice tool in being able to communicate in a more meaningful way than the trend in society is going.

    The obsession with emails, facebook, twitter and mixed with mobile devices means that people are so preoccupied that they just cannot communicate in a way that shows care. Almost narsarsitic trend.

    SOC gives you the system to send cards on birthdays, anniversaries, xmas, and a hundred other events and or promptings in just a few minutes with a few clicks of a mouse.

    Its also offers people if they pay attention a great personal development program with seminars, webinars and constant contact. If you truly want to succeed in SOC or anything for that matter you will.

    Its one thing to count the cost but counting the benefits have been totally left out here because of your personal experience.

    Just look at so called main stream business statistics there are far worse than anything quoted here. For a few hundred bucks you can plug into a system that can bring great rewards on many levels.

    And for the record i have been a retail user of the system for 4 years and recommend it to many business people as a unique contact tool.

    Are there other companies that do similar things to SOC of course but not everyone drives a lexus do they and MLM does not suit everyone and it definitely doesn’t suit people that never really understand what it takes to be successful in this area..

    • Andrew says:

      Cam,

      Thanks for writing.

      Any review of anything is narrow because it is focused on the thing being reviewed. I’m not sure what point you are trying to make by calling a review “narrow.”

      As to calling it biased, by all means, find some item in the numbers I present that is incorrect due to some bias on my part. If you can find such a thing I will gladly remedy it – but you won’t, as the numbers are what they are. It sounds to me like you are calling something “biased” when it is actually just a negative review based on facts. The facts of the matter absolutely support a negative review of MLMs in general and SendOutCards in particular.

      Whether communication in the digital age connects us or separates us is an interesting topic, but completely irrelevant to the point at hand. Nothing about the effects of digital communication indicates anything in favor of, or against, the MLM industry. As to SOC giving people a way to send cards on important dates, well, systems for doing that already existed long before SOC. We called them “Calendars, pens, and stamps.”

      Perhaps you are saying that you find use in the automation that SOC provides – but that does not make people feel more cared for. A computer generated card that is easily seen to be just that rather than a personal message, printed with smudgy inks on low quality card stock, does not tell people you care about them. Quite the reverse: it tells them you did not care enough to take two minutes to write a brief note, stick it in an envelope, affix a stamp, and put it in your mailbox. “Look, I got an automated note from a guy who probably doesn’t even realize it was sent” does not make people feel like they matter to the sender.

      You are simply wrong when you suggest that anyone can succeed at SOC “if they really want to.” No amount of effort, and no amount of desire, can change the fact that the MLM business model is designed in such a way that most people will fail. It will not matter how hard they try, nor how much they want to succeed. The MLM model works like this:

      • The overwhelming majority of participants lose money.
      • A tiny number break even at best.

      • A microscopic number turn some modest profit.
      • An infinitesimally small number make a bundle.

      That’s how it works, and the numbers prove it to be true no matter how much you may wish otherwise.

      You’re also wrong that I “leave out the benefits.” My analysis and charts show the places in which people make money. They are simply few and far between, with most people losing money. I never said nobody makes money. I said that the overwhelming majority do not, and most take a loss. That is just the truth – but I do not ever say that there are no people whatsoever who make money in MLMs. There are – but they are all causing massive financial destruction to large numbers of people in order to attain that success.

      You suggest “looking at so-called main stream business statistics.” By all means, provide some links to data that shows what you are talking about. Without providing data you are simply doing nothing more than stating an unfounded opinion. The truth is that in the MLM world, and SOC in particular, “for a few hundred bucks” all you plug into is a system that is almost certain to make you lose money above and beyond that “few hundred bucks.”

      If you have been recommending it to other business people you have been doing them a grave dis-service. Reliable, high-quality print-on-demand mailing houses exist in abundance without having to resort to using the enormously destructive MLM-based ones. They offer better service than SOC, lower prices than SOC, and higher quality than SOC. If you are recommending SOC you are directing business people to overpay for a product and service that is inferior to its non-MLM competitors and which causes harm to it’s legions of sales reps. You should seriously rethink your decision to promote SOC.

      And yes, there are other companies that do “similar things to SOC.” And they are better, but (and this is something you really need to absorb) they COST LESS THAN SOC and DO NOT HARM THEIR SALES FORCE.

      Finally, contrary to your last statement I know exactly what it takes to be successful in the MLM world: One must be willing to inflict gross financial harm on large numbers of other people in order to generate personal profit. In other words, to be successful in an MLM a person must be willing to make money by hurting other people. That’s all there is to it. Every single person who is turning a profit in the MLM world is doing so by hurting other people. They hurt the ones who are plain customers by selling them junk at inflated prices. They hurt recruits by involving them in a business that will lose most of them a great deal of money.

      If one is capable of making money in the MLM world it does not make him a great business person. It makes him an unethical, immoral business predator willing to open the financial jugular of others by deceiving them, either overtly or passively, into buying MLM products or joining MLM businesses.

      The truth is that since MLM products and services are over-priced garbage compared to the offerings of traditional companies every MLM customer is harmed. Since the MLM business model is statistically a near-guaranteed failure for the entire recruit base it is harmful to recruit. If you sell MLM products or recruit MLM reps you are not doing a good deed. You are spreading harm like wildfire.

    • Andrew says:

      Also, having just done a little research on your domain name, it seems that you are involved in some way with a Carbon Credit MLM, which strikes me as a really unfortunate thing. Taking advantage of people’s commendable interest in preserving the world’s ecosystems in order to slap an MLM structure into place is a horrific abuse of the good intentions of people around the world. Carbon Credit MLM industries are also so laden with fraud and criminal activity that Interpol is warning people not to participate in them and has been arresting people who use them as money laundering schemes.

      That’s another thing you should seriously reconsider promoting, Cam.

      Read about it here:

  2. Wesley says:

    Andrew, thanks for putting this article together. I’m grateful for the insights but it makes me sad. I thought the concept of SOC was great and really liked the idea behind it. It seems like it would be relatively easy to promote. But alas, you’ve pointed out some glaring flaws in the company structure. I will have to pass – reluctantly.

    • Andrew says:

      Wesley,

      Thanks for taking the time to write. Boiled down to its essence Send Out Cards is a print-on-demand mailing house with a network marketing structure built on top of it. There are plenty of other print-on-demand mailing houses out there which operate on conventional business structures, saving their customers the high cost of paying commissions to many levels of sales people for every card. Those mailing houses often use better quality paper, ink, and printing methods — along with frequently being much more reliable than SOC.

      It *is* a sad thing to see, because the idea of making it easy to do real greeting cards has some merit, but the MLM business model just sours the whole thing.

  3. Riel says:

    So true! Don’t know about this particular company, but my limited MLM exposure made me learn the hard way to stay away from them. You’re spot on! Very informative, Andrew. Thank you!

    • Andrew says:

      Thanks. In hindsight I wish I had not gotten involved. I learned the downside of the industry the hard way. I thought I should share the knowledge with the hope of saving others from what I had to deal with.

  4. REPORTED says:

    YOU SIR ARE AN IDIOT AND DO NOT WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT. ANY EXPERIENCED MARKETER RIGHT NOW IS LAUGHING AT YOU. YOUR JUST MAD YOU CANT SUCCEED SO STFU

    • Andrew says:

      Well, goodness. What a charming message you’ve typed while leaning on the caps-lock key with all your might. And such a creative fake e-mail address you chose to use – was that meant as a really immature joke or are you making a statement about your particular interests in the bedroom, Mr. Suck-a-dick from Gmail? As to your equally poorly chosen username, is that meant to indicate you are “reporting” me to SendOutCards? By all means, do so. See, I think you may misunderstand how this works.

      If you bring my post to their attention and they are foolish enough to do something like sue me for libel, well, that simply provides me a public forum with which to address these concerns – and one that can inflict legal remedy against the company. See, the defense against libel is the truth. Since this article is truthful and accurate they would have no case, while the legal system and the FTC would have a field day with the folks at SOC. So, by all means, report me.

      Also, if you think I am wrong go ahead and point out the flaws in my analysis. Show me where the numbers are wrong. Give evidence in support of your claim. Without doing so all you have accomplished with your gigantic capitalized letters is paint yourself as a raving internet troll, and one who does not even have the courage to reveal his or her identity.

      With such small reserves of courage as you are displaying it’s no wonder you chose to remain anonymous.

  5. […] recently posted an article showing how to pick about an MLM’s Income Disclosure Statement to see just how badly getting […]

  6. […] article has been moved to a new home (click here to read it) at my personal blog as The Commentary Dentist will be shutting its doors soon. Thanks for your […]

Leave a Reply